Too Many Customers

Over a handful of decades, sweeping government interventionism, layers of suffocating regulation, and a bonanza of socialized cash grabs have propelled the cost of quality health care into the stratosphere. The system is operating in crises mode. Long gone are the days of personalized house calls and high quality custom care givers. Modern medicine is about finding some form of effectiveness in a sea of inefficiency.

A burgeoning elephant of wasteful regulatory infrastructure, faceless insurance payouts, and corporate drug pushing has become obsessed with the supernatural feat of supporting it's own weight. Waves of social parasites infest its bowels, hoards of litigator predators try to rip fat from bone, the preoccupied pachyderm has not the time, nor desire, to focus on something as annoying as patients.

The solution is clear.

Anyone who has waited in line at the Post Office intuitively understands the central problem of high quality, socialized service delivery: too many customers. And so goes the government solution for a health care debacle of its own doing: Universal Health Control (UHC), Washington rationed care for the growing class of American destitute.

There is nothing really "universal" about UHC. The ruling congressional/presidential aristocracy and the corporate elite who purchase their every selfish deed, retain gold plated plans which escort their loved ones to the head of line. UHC is only "universal" to the masses of concrete cube socialism.

UHC's magic elixir relieves more than the financial strain of minions living too long, it is the answer to most of D.C.'s corporate and political prayers. Universal Health Control has always been a magic potion that grants everything a dictator desires. Denial of care isn't about controlling the cost of dying, it is about corralling the will of the living.



UHC efficiently restores harmony and balance to the lopsided equation of long lines and unfunded treatment, not by removing the wealth draining social parasites that suck our resources dry, but by facilitating dying; by shortening the line. By denying care to the non-paying customers who selfishly focus on growing old, UHC streamlines the costly process of our elderly passing.

The problem with high quality socialized service delivery is, as is always the case with government lines: too many customers. The bureaucrats' answer is equally predictable: more agency growth, ever increasing pay and benefits, more overhead, enlisting new armies of industry regulators, intensifying intestinal meddling and encouraging litigation to destroy the village in order to save it, Vietnam-style.

If you examine our broad-based health care problem, honestly and unselfishly, you too will agree there is no more effective way to increase the quality of service delivery than to shorten the line. Truly compassionate people understand that the ends justify the means.