Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Follow the Money (Part 1)


The history of the United States is one of relentless struggle against monarchical financial plunder. With the 1913 reinstatement of the king's bank in America, we've slipped back into financial slavery on behalf of the same faceless money power.

As is the case with swindlers and horse thieves, cowards prefer to blend into the shadows. Heroes are more easily recognized. The Federal Reserve central bank mocks the prominent men who tried to beat them, by trading their heads on the same private paper debt those heroes tried to exterminate.


"If ever again our nation stumbles upon unfunded paper, it shall surely be like death to our body politic. This country will crash."

- George Washington (likely a paraphrase)


FDR, arguably the most successful agent of the modern Federal Reserve and limitless national debt, designed the back of the Fed's $1 bill. When he signed off on the design, he scribbled a note to move the Eye of Providence to the more prominent position, even though it is the back side of the Great Seal of the United States. [click here to enlarge]


"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and the corporations that grow up around them will deprive the people of all property, until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."

- Thomas Jefferson


"I have two great enemies, the southern army in front of me and the financial institutions in the rear. Of the two, the one in the rear is the greatest enemy. The money power preys upon the nation in times of peace, and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. It denounces, as public enemies, all who question its methods or throw light upon its crimes."

- Abraham Lincoln

"I know with certainty the division of the United States into federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the high financial powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the United States, if they remained as one block, and as one nation, would attain economic and financial independence, which would upset their financial domination over the world" ... "The death of Lincoln was a disaster for Christendom. There was no man in the United States great enough to wear his boots and the bankers went anew to grab the riches. I fear that foreign bankers with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America and use it to systematically corrupt civilization. They will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos in order that the earth should become their inheritance"

- Otto von Bismark, Chancellor of Germany


"A national debt, if it is not excessive, will be to us a national blessing."

- Alexander Hamilton

Hamilton instated the first central bank in America, but a careful reading of Hamilton reveals he thought a strong but fair U.S. bank was a necessity if we were to ever throw off the moneyed power of the Bank of England. In Treason in America, Anton Chaitkin details how the BoE dispatched Aaron Burr to murder Hamilton, which he did.


"You are a den of vipers and thieves! I will to rout you out, by the Eternal God, I will rout you out. If the American people understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system there would be revolution by morning."

- Andrew Jackson

"I will kill you before you kill me! "


- Andrew Jackson, to the Second (Central) Bank of the U.S. after a failed assassination attempt

To my knowledge, Andrew Jackson was the only man, ever, to successfully kill a central bank, thereby embarking on a 75 year stretch of booming prosperity where wealth was the property of the people. The Industrial Revolution was born.


See Part 2

15 comments:

  1. Nice summary. And of course there was JFK's Executive Order 11110 which would have given the United States the power and ability to create its own currency...a big middle finger to the private FED:


    "By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:

    SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended --

    (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j):

    "(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption," and

    (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof.

    SEC. 2. The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.

    JOHN F. KENNEDY
    THE WHITE HOUSE,
    June 4, 1963"


    Of course the missing head on his physical body is celebrated on the Kennedy half-dollar.

    ReplyDelete
  2. woops...didn't see the Part I above haha. I'm sure you'll cover it. my bad.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is funny that the most potentially damaging story to our American welfare is control by central bankers, but it is also the most obscure story, I have never heard anyone but FDR mention any of this.

    I still have normal skepticism about believing something I have never heard about before, so I would be interested in reading a little more about the roots of central banking here and elsewhere, I understand the central bank of england has been at this even longer. Are the central banks all run by the same people?

    What I hope to get out of this blog is more of the background of the central banks in the history of commerce, how it all fits together behind the scenes. What is really going on.

    I read a report that the bankers actually have their own little enclave in London where they are untouchable by British law.

    It is hard to know what to think about all this because it is not part of our national lore. I am not even sure if any of our elected officials outside of Ron Paul know anything about the central bank.

    It is easy to say that politicians are on the take, but I honestly doubt any of them are smart enough to understand what the central banks do.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Actually Ron Paul, as a strict constitutionalist, believes that the Federal Reserve should be abolished, and he is one of the few brave souls out there who understand the parasitic nature of central bankers and is not afraid to say it.

    Interviewers listening to him have this blank look on their faces when he mentions it because they are oblivious to the subtle but pervasive nature and influence of the Fed, just like the majority of the sheeple.

    The cynic in me believes that there is now a less than zero chance that he or any other grassroots candidate supporting the abolishment of the FED would ever be elected president. They would be effectively marginalized and branded as "renegades" or "outcasts" by the bought-for mainstream media just like Dr. Paul. Either that or they would be celebrated on a new federal reserve note.

    Obama's subsequent pick for Secretary of Treasury, the actual head fox guarding the henhouse himself the NY FED PRESIDENT Geithner only proves that at this critical juncture in history, the POTUS is a mere puppet of the policies of the central bankers.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "It is easy to say that politicians are on the take, but I honestly doubt any of them are smart enough to understand what the central banks do."

    On the take...

    ...to the tune of $11T in already-spent debt for votes, printed by the Fed...

    ...with far more to come.

    You are right that most politicians don't understand what is happening to them.

    Essentially the scam is to fool our most vulnerable (congress) into spending trillions upon trillions of central bank debt repayable above all other national priorities at perpetual interest (250% over the lifetime of the notes), and the rest of the people simply don't matter.

    Proof?

    We are paying $330B in annual interest payments on the national debt alone, but have you heard the Federal Reserve offer to waive those payments as an instant "stimulus" to the economy?

    After all, the Fed is just part of the government, right? So there is no downside whatsoever to waiving all of the principle and all of the interest "owed" to our own government.

    Of course, that will never happen. Because that $350B per year, or 11% of the total Federal budget, is not governmental at all. It is 11% stolen annually from the people, in broad daylight, for doing absolutely nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Obama's subsequent pick for Secretary of Treasury, the actual head fox guarding the henhouse himself the NY FED PRESIDENT Geithner only proves that at this critical juncture in history"

    Exactly right.

    Obama's choice to place the head of the snake, the NY Fed, in charge of all US accounts reveals without question that Obama is an loyal agent to the banks, same as Bush.

    Huge market losses to come over the next decade or more (which is why this is relevant to investing/trading) as our national wealth is overtly seized "to save us" from the same virus that is stealing it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I would like to know more about where the bankers come from. Geithner and Bernanke and everyone that works at the FED (including my wife a few years back before going to the private sector for better pay) have no idea what the scam is. They just think they are part of a sort of government entity that plays a vital role blah, blah, blah...They think they are good guys.

    So I would like to know more about the real operatives behind the bank, not just the clowns front and center. Hopefully we can learn more about what goes on behind the scenes. I have seen tidbits from time to time over the internet, but this blog would be a good place to compile tidbits.

    ReplyDelete
  8. in the mid-1980's, Jello Biafra, lead singer of the Dead Kennedy's ran for mayor of San Francisco. At the time he, along with Frank Zappa, were being prosecuted for obscenity laws. Jello's platform was the suggestion that all bankers should wear clown suits. He came in third

    ReplyDelete
  9. Here is a BRIEF history of the money changers:

    http://tinyurl.com/oftbe

    ReplyDelete
  10. "I read a report that the bankers actually have their own little enclave in London where they are untouchable by British law."

    YES, it is called the "city of London" , it has it own seperate police force whoose main job is to keep people OUT of the square mile ( that the space of prime real estate the bankster's own) in times of trouble. No other police force i.e the Metropoliton Police which covers the rest of london, has access there.

    Been like that for the last 330 odd years

    ReplyDelete
  11. Let's not lie. The "City" is the administrative area that was encompassed by London's old city walls. It was the "original" London. As such it is it's own burrough with its own police force. They don't guard the banks in particular and are subject to the same laws. It so happens that a lot of financial institutions (now mainly insurance firms) are located in the City. However, most banks are now located on Canary Wharf. That was my old hang-out.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Check out who owns the square mile, freehold & the like ( and without liens) !!!

    Canary Wharf was built with debt on the mud & the marshes. the elite dont car about old docklands landfill sites

    ReplyDelete
  13. The Money Masters Video (available on Google Video) although very long (over 3.5 hours) is worth watching. Although it was made over 10years ago it is probably more relevant today than it was then.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I prefer the G. Washington portrait on the 1905 $20 gold certificate. The 'technicolor' twenty.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Thank You

    I beleive the topic you discuss here is THE defining issue of our lifetime, the "who controls the currency" issue - the people or the anti-people.

    ReplyDelete

The USA's political-economc system is best described as:

On Nov 2, 2010, I plan to vote (FOR or AGAINST) my incumbent congressman

 
Free Hit Counter