Sub-freezing temperatures have engulfed both hemispheres. The U.S. is encountering its most dangerous winter in decades, maybe centuries, at some 10 degrees colder than average. 23% have no employment to heat their home, or are on the street. Most of Europe is buried under ice and snow, the temperature is 30 degrees F below normal at the moment.
During the last Ice Age, most of England was covered in snow, today, the entire country is buried:
Yes i know , i'm living it ( i'm in England)
ReplyDeleteworst we have had here for 30 years
must be Global Warm snow warming
"Yes i know , i'm living it ( i'm in England)
ReplyDeleteworst we have had here for 30 years
must be Global Warm snow warming"
Just think how bad it would've been without all those greenhouse gases greening up the earth.
Are you seriously suggesting that the recent Snow in England is evidence against global warming? That would be as crazy as me claiming that the way, way above average temprature in Southern Europe last month was evidence *for* global warming.
ReplyDeleteI had read your blogs with interest before this, but if this is your reasoning, then I suddenly have great doubts about your analytical thinking.
"I had read your blogs with interest before this, but if this is your reasoning, then I suddenly have great doubts about your analytical thinking."
ReplyDeleteExactly, there is no solid evidence for or against GW, though the earth is colder today than when the auto was invented.
It is purely designed to steal money from people who are too faithful to believe that almost everything your gov does is designed to financially rape you on behalf of your corporate owners.
FDR wrote: "Exactly, there is no solid evidence for or against GW, though the earth is colder today than when the auto was invented."
ReplyDeleteThat's correct, and I agree with you that much of the global warming thing is a ploy to steal.
But when there's no solid evidence for or against something, what's the most reasonable thing to do? Simple: fall back on what you know.
And in this case, we know that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, that if you increase its concentration it will act as an insulator and the temperature will rise. That itself is indisputable, and it can be proven at will.
For an increase in CO2 to not result in an increase in temperatures, there has to be a counterbalancing effect somewhere. This, too, is indisputable. What's under dispute is whether or not there is such a counterbalancing effect and, if there is, what it is and what its limits are.
If we don't know of such a counterbalancing effect, then it follows that we must assume the nonexistence of one until such time as one is found. To assume the existence of one anyway is akin to believing in religion: the belief in something that has no supporting evidence.
Therefore, while I do not believe that we should be making crazy policy decisions that would result in economic calamity, I do believe that we should make prudent decisions under the assumption that warming will eventually happen if we allow the concentration of CO2 to continuously increase -- because the physics of the matter says it must happen, and the physics we do know is indisputable.
"And in this case, we know that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, that if you increase its concentration it will act as an insulator and the temperature will rise. That itself is indisputable, and it can be proven at will."
ReplyDeleteYes, CO2 is a "GREEN"house gas, meaning if you want "Green" you should produce as much CO2 as possible.
Green plants thrive in a carbon-rich, toasty-warm environment.
The only reason to limit CO2 is to ensure the comfort and dominance of greedy men at the direct expense of earth's environment.
So yes, we do know a few things. And one of those things is that Green = more CO2. It is indisputable.
As for the temp scam, we also know the earth has always fluctuated on various interlocking cycles. The Sun spot cycle is about 11 years, and there are clearly others that we can measure but don't fully understand.
The Sun spot cycle has warmed Mars and Jupiter much more than the Earth, recently, but now we are all cooling very rapidly.
In the case of Mars, the ice caps receded over the past 10 years, because the increase in Solar output affects the smaller planet more. That is because the planet's molten core cools faster, lowering the magneto effect and allowing the solar wind to penetrate deeper and break away more of its atmosphere.
As for Jupiter's decade-long surge in temp, we don't fully understand it, but with 3 Great Red Spots (mega-storms), a phenomenon never been observed by humans before, it is also indisputable.
Point is, we know for certain that the Sun is the cause the warming/cooling cycles that we can actually observe.
We also know the earth is about 1 degree cooler today that the the year 1900. So unless auto emissions cool the earth, the anti-auto global warming political movement (not to be confused with natural global warming and cooling cycles which are real) has one purpose:
...steal money, even if less CO2 means less green.