Because it is not unlikely. What is unlikely is inflation continuing forever. Inflation is simple crime, immoral, premeditated theft perpetrated by deeply evil people. Nature does not allow a system built on systemic corruption to thrive.
So where are we now? Let's take inventory.
The latest Big Bull Market started in 1932 at Dow 40 and it peaked (according to more broad indexes than the Dow) in 2000 at Dow 12,000. Lest one mistake that for natural growth...
$40 compounded at 3% real growth for 68 years is a whopping $298.53. That's right, in 2000 when our most recent bull officially died, the Dow was roughly 97%-pure inflation. To think inflation will continue when 11,700/12,000 dollars is nothing but stolen buying power, well, seems just as odd as predicting it will go on ad infinitum.
The hardest thing to me, about forecasting Dow 800, is justifying a number so high. Well, part of that is cheating. I'm adding 20 years to the above, so the steady state growth number is more like Dow 540. Call me an optimist, but I think Americans are a hard working people, we can squeeze out another 50%.
Another clarifier is Elliott Wave analysis. Anyone who has watched stocks thorough an EW lens for a while knows that 2nd wave retracements of entire first waves are not only possible, they are common. In fact, it is pretty uncanny how many 1st waves retreat to about their stating point, spanning all degrees, from minute-to-minute to year by year. The most common EW retracement, which is technically a guideline but happens predictably, is a wave 2 termination in the vicinity of the previous wave 2 of one lesser degree, that is, at wave 2 of the previous 4-to-5 wave of the same degree. That indicates a strong probability of revisiting the price territory of the Dow's 1974 to 1978 low (the wave 2 retracement within the previous 5th wave), or 740.
Next, there is gold. When the elite index of what was, then, a true industrial power, lost 90% in the 1930's, partial gold backing was still an inflation mitigator. Even thought the US didn't have near enough gold to cover all the dollars in circulation, the "gold standard" still enforced some wealth reserve to reign in mega-inflation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17832/1783219cbcc30a799509616bf4af218b2052b071" alt=""
U.S. Capitol Steps, 1932
Contrast to today. Not only did we allow 97% of our collective national wealth to be purchased away from us using nothing but worthless printed paper, now we have a gold price of $950 pumped from just $20 at the beginning of the inflationary bull market. That means that if this decline equals the 90% decline of the 1930s (which was on the gold standard), look out, because this time asset prices, reflected by globally priced gold, have as much as 97% to fall just to return to the steady-state baseline. In other words, we have exponentially more paper inflation in our prices than they had at the kickoff of the Great Depression. I guess that should be obvious, the Federal Reserve's Great Depression pilot program peaked at Dow 390, the mature program deployment peaked at Dow 14,000+.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee61e/ee61e6d4d51761dbb777153b2d24449897e43917" alt=""
LA County Employment Bureau, mid-1930's
Now consider the boat anchor. The inflation kludge, the one criminal central bankers forced upon Americans to cause their original Great Depression, is still with us in larger form. No surprise that the exact same poor-->rich wealth-transfer schemes that caused the Great Depression, are causing GD 2.0. FDR's creation of the welfare state, his socializing the losses of wild bank speculation with customer deposits through the FDIC, his heavy handed FHA/government influence in real estate markets--all remain the direct and immediate causes of both depressions--ours being an entire EW degree larger than the Great Depression.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a482/9a482e945f26d3d495113f8b08d9bf51944bc628" alt=""
Living on birds hunted by the children. Nipoma, California, 1936
So let's check ourselves in for a quick financial physical. Our deficit in 2009 is projected to be about $1.5T, about a 45% shortfall. Problem is, that assumes income taxes keep rolling in. They won't. New York City, a huge windfall for D.C. paid 97% less tax revenue in 2008 than at peak. California was a bigger economy than China by many measures, our largest Federal cash cow at peak inflation. Now CA can't fund their own tax refunds, let alone contribute to the national scene. With national spending on a pace to double every few months or so, our physical exam looks downright ugly.
We had about 140M taxpayers; we've got an official U6 of 14% and we're losing a million taxpayers every six weeks. Let's say the real number right now is about 120M contributors. Median income is around $50K. $12T in overt debt/120M is negative $100K per taxpayer, twice the most common income. Take your income and double it, that is roughly your mind-numbing debt. Don't forget to add a couple of trillion every year for the foreseeable future. Our national obligations, including promises congress has made on behalf of unborn Americans, total about $70T, or half the cumulative wealth of every human living on Earth. The patient is flat-lined.
Dow 800? Ready or not, here it comes.
Please explain the part about FDR's New Deal claiming 100M lives?
Thanks.